🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about the remarks delivered by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, me too. But really. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). He said in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport in succession. He is more than justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person sensibly had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. His top-class delivery and concussive power on both front side and reverse side are more than enough to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly exploded to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's play in that very quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the last game, his first serve floated to heaven. He extended the contest twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {