🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager endured a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach and then fire them for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and then bin them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.