🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing video footage of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Background on the Case and Ban

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the regulator petitioned the classification board to officially classify the circulating video. The board first determined the content was "refused classification", a designation that empowered the regulator to instruct platforms to restrict access to the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, stating it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of public importance that generated widespread discussion". The platform drew a parallel between the video and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a longer or clearer version with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the board changed the rating of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

Some on the panel disagreed, contending the post was "a shareable video for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released years after the event, "after public sentiment around the matter had subsided".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the decision.

"X fought this decision to defend free speech and the critical nature of access to information about issues of public interest. We remain dedicated to protecting these principles."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner acknowledged the ruling, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Violent Content

In related news, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to apply sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on this material in line with their existing community guidelines.